Vice President Mike Pence said he did now not recognize why there would be a basis for Congress to pursue impeachment against President Donald Trump.Pence: 'I wouldn't recognize why there could be' impeachment complaints 1“I wouldn’t understand why there might be; I, in reality, wouldn’t,” Pence stated in an interview aired Sunday with Fox News’s Maria Bartiromo.
Growing numbers of Democrats in Congress have called for impeachment proceedings to begin. One sitting member on the GOP aspect, Michigan Rep. Justin Amash, has argued the special recommend research-tested Trump-dedicated impeachable offenses.
Pence stated on Fox News that the troubles former FBI Director Robert Mueller and his team investigated have been “entirely over.”

“The special suggest confirmed that there has been no collusion between our campaign and the Russians, and the Department of Justice has confirmed that there has been no collusion, no obstruction, the matter is over,” Pence said.

The publicly released model of Mueller’s record stated the research “did now not set up that contributors of the Trump marketing campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government,” and the report said investigators were not able to clean Trump of obstruction of justice and laid out proof of potential obstacle. Attorney General William Barr later stated that warranty becomes “not enough” to price Trump with block.

In the interview, Pence additionally talked up the Trump management’s cooperation with the special suggest, saying its settlement to offer investigators with witnesses and documents amounted to “full cooperation” — notwithstanding Trump’s refusal to post to an in-person interview with the special counsel, a point with which the Mueller file expressed overt frustration.

Confused yet? Through the years, I recognize that I frequently became careworn approximately the distinction between those two obvious opposite messages. But then I found out that now and then, bad information for one person can be perceived as proper news for someone else and that adequate information about at least one character over the years can be perceived as horrific.

Confused? Let me explain.

In the end, it is just information, and what makes it bad or properly or maybe impartial is not the news itself but how we perceive it, judge it, evaluate it, or react due to it.
How can a person understand terrible information at the top, you may ask? Or, the alternative, how should someone perceive top news as awful?

In quick – every folk has a unique history, reviews, beliefs, and values, and as a result, no people ever see the identical thing or conditions in the same manner.
Someone who is a worrier, poor, pessimistic, or impatient might see a put-off as awful when another man or woman who is familiar with the concept of matters we will manage. We can’t handle things, so why get upset about something you can’t manipulate or, if you could control it, get busy?

In the quite the whole thing that happens, we interpret all of it primarily based on our expectations, dreams, needs, or mindsets, which are particular for each folk.
Let me provide you with a couple of personal examples. And if you remember the explanation, even though you can not have had identical situations, if you may reflect consideration on it, I’ll be you could relate.

Before starting my speaker and training career, I became a national income supervisor for a worldwide organization. Long story, but the quick aspect is I had difficulty with my boss, the president, and as a result, he fired me. Bad news, proper? Well, that turned into all I had to determine. It has become time to begin a career that has lasted over 40 years and has allowed me to peer the arena (25 international locations thus far) and paint with some first-rate customers and audiences. So, in the long run, this terrible news became suitable news.


I work as a health blogger at, where I write about weight loss, food, recipes, nutrition, fitness, beauty, parenting, and much more. I love sharing knowledge to empower others to lead healthier lives.